<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This topic</title>
    <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2085804#M1203663</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just an update and some(lots) of questions for you guys. So the SVLAN reports at the exchange came back saying no congestion, they monitored it for 48 hours last Friday and speeds were just as bad as today. Line tests didn't reveal any crosstalk or any problems that could be picked up on remotely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My router stats show a full sync speed of 55mb and that is the package I'm on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an engineer booked for next week anyway, but I don't think it's going to change anything, I guess it's needed to be able to progress this further though and he can check my wiring etc to give BT more evidence I guess.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the idea is to find out why I'm getting bad throughput speeds at peak times, if I'm not on a congested SVLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for some info, all speed tests are done via ethernet (the one supplied with the router) and I live alone, so I know nothing else is using up bandwidth, I checked the router stats and disabled Wifi. Connected via test socket using the microfilter supplied. No phones are connected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did another quiet line test at the test socket and this time it was actually quiet, no noise at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So first the router stats, I actually heard somewhere that the noise margin on the lower Fibre 1 package is normally set at 10db due to the decrease in sync speed needed, can anyone confirm this? The noise margin also doesn't seem to either go below 10db or above 10.9db, no matter what really, just floats around 10.5 normally. Also for what it's worth, when I was with TalkTalk on their top fibre package, the target noise margin was 3db and it was 3db, didn't go above 3.9db. I don't think there is noise on the line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another thing is that for some reason it says BT Wifi activated, even though I opted out like 3 weeks ago. It does say it's disabled on other pages though, not sure why this page doesn't update, I also did a WiFi channel scan and did see a hidden SSID with the same channel and signal strength as mine, I'm also the only one on BT in my block of 6 flats. Could a mod confirm if BT Wifi is actually disabled for me? I know it's supposed to only use a very small percentage of bandwidth, but I don't want it on and I did turn it off on the BT.com website.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I first reported this congestion problem via live chat, the guy on the other end did some tests and said he had problems connecting to the router and put an order in for a replacement, for some reason the despatch date is 2nd Sept and that was ordered on 31 July. I wonder if there is some hardware issue in the new hub and they are waiting for the new versions, could just be a delay in sending it out though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Product code:Smart Hub 2&lt;BR /&gt;Serial number:+091298+2019002006&lt;BR /&gt;Firmware version:v0.17.01.12312-BT&lt;BR /&gt;Firmware updated:Thu Jul 30 00:50:29 2020&lt;BR /&gt;Board version:R01&lt;BR /&gt;GUI version:1.56 15_02_2019&lt;BR /&gt;DSL uptime:0 days,00 Hours33 Mins37 Secs (This is due to me connecting to the test socket, the resync was caused by me)&lt;BR /&gt;Data rate:9.997 Mbps / 55 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Maximum data rate:23.033 Mbps / 73.482 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Noise margin:14.0 / 10.7&lt;BR /&gt;Line attenuation:8.4 / 16.9&lt;BR /&gt;Signal attenuation:8.4 / 18.9&lt;BR /&gt;VLAN id:101&lt;BR /&gt;Upstream error control:Off&lt;BR /&gt;Downstream error control:Off&lt;BR /&gt;Data sent / received:74.8 MB Uploaded / 387.1 MB Downloaded&lt;BR /&gt;Broadband username:bthomehub@btbroadband.com&lt;BR /&gt;BT Wi-fi:Activated&lt;BR /&gt;2.4 GHz wireless network name:*&lt;BR /&gt;2.4 GHz wireless channel:Smart (Channel1)&lt;BR /&gt;5 GHz wireless network name:*&lt;BR /&gt;5 GHz wireless channel:Smart (Channel36)&lt;BR /&gt;Wireless security:WPA2 (Recommended)&lt;BR /&gt;Wireless mode:Mode 1&lt;BR /&gt;Firewall:On&lt;BR /&gt;MAC address:*&lt;BR /&gt;Software variant:-&lt;BR /&gt;Boot loader: 0.1.7-BT (Thu Nov 30 09:45:22 2017)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the speed tests done at 12PM Friday. So ideally these should be congestion free and they are, getting full speeds, no problems at all:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1598007595825925955" style="width: 316px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67896iB636477475E425D7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1598007595825925955" alt="1598007595825925955" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="btwholesale.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67897i29D6656358DA064E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="btwholesale.png" alt="btwholesale.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mlabs12pm.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67898i4983B248AC59D964/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="mlabs12pm.png" alt="mlabs12pm.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="fast1.png" style="width: 200px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67899i0766E79B94E553D6/image-size/small?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="fast1.png" alt="fast1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also did a couple trace routes, to see if there is any difference between 12PM and the later tests:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to google.com [216.58.198.174]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms 172.16.10.180&lt;BR /&gt;3 * * * Request timed out.&lt;BR /&gt;4 7 ms 6 ms 6 ms 31.55.185.180&lt;BR /&gt;5 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms core1-hu0-6-0-8.colindale.ukcore.bt.net.ukcore.bt.net [213.121.192.4]&lt;BR /&gt;6 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms peer7-et-0-1-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.252.148]&lt;BR /&gt;7 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms 109.159.253.235&lt;BR /&gt;8 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 74.125.253.75&lt;BR /&gt;9 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 108.170.232.99&lt;BR /&gt;10 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms lhr25s10-in-f14.1e100.net [216.58.198.174]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trace complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [151.101.0.81]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 ms 3 ms 4 ms 172.16.10.180&lt;BR /&gt;3 * 6 ms 6 ms 31.55.185.177&lt;BR /&gt;4 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 31.55.185.176&lt;BR /&gt;5 7 ms 15 ms 6 ms core2-hu0-12-0-1.colindale.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.127.118]&lt;BR /&gt;6 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 194.72.16.230&lt;BR /&gt;7 * * * Request timed out.&lt;BR /&gt;8 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 151.101.0.81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And here is the speed tests done at 8.30PMish Friday. I mean to me, if I get perfect speeds at 12PM and then the following at peak time, this is clear congestion, no? But what can I do if BT is saying the SVLAN is not reporting congestion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's pretty unlikely that the congestion is at the cabinet isn't it? Is there anywhere else that congestion can effect after the SVLAN? I would of thought anything after that would be picked up on instantly though and this problem has been going on for weeks now. Months, if you include TalkTalk also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peak time speed tests 8.30PM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1598038317229853655" style="width: 316px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67900iFD96C586468E0C61/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1598038317229853655" alt="1598038317229853655" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="btwholesale2.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67902i33E5156783BE7C7E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="btwholesale2.png" alt="btwholesale2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="fast2.png" style="width: 200px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67901iA0FDDB85DC707E2A/image-size/small?v=v2&amp;amp;px=200" role="button" title="fast2.png" alt="fast2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mlab2.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67903i7F216AD5D3D3F020/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="mlab2.png" alt="mlab2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to google.com [172.217.169.46]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 172.16.10.180&lt;BR /&gt;3 * * * Request timed out.&lt;BR /&gt;4 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms 31.55.185.176&lt;BR /&gt;5 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms core1-hu0-8-0-1.colindale.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.127.144]&lt;BR /&gt;6 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms peer2-et0-0-1.slough.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.103.202]&lt;BR /&gt;7 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms 109.159.253.71&lt;BR /&gt;8 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 216.239.42.41&lt;BR /&gt;9 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 172.253.66.89&lt;BR /&gt;10 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms lhr48s08-in-f14.1e100.net [172.217.169.46]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [151.101.64.81]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms &amp;lt;1 ms 192.168.1.254&lt;BR /&gt;2 4 ms 3 ms 4 ms 172.16.10.180&lt;BR /&gt;3 * * * Request timed out.&lt;BR /&gt;4 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 31.55.185.176&lt;BR /&gt;5 7 ms 6 ms 6 ms core2-hu0-2-0-3.colindale.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.127.114]&lt;BR /&gt;6 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms peer3-et-7-0-4.redbus.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.103.252]&lt;BR /&gt;7 * * * Request timed out.&lt;BR /&gt;8 7 ms 6 ms 6 ms 151.101.64.81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So pretty clear and well below acceptable speeds at peak times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I ask about the cabinet, is because, I also had this problem with TalkTalk, so it was either a coincidence that they also had congestion problems at the exchange. Or there is something wrong with another piece of equipment before/after the SVLAN, such as the MSE/BRAS. Even if my block of flats had crosstalk problems would that not affect the sync speed, rather than throughput speed? The sync speed is 55mb still at 8:30pm. I personally don't think we have crosstalk problems, we are a new build (ish) and they used cat5e to run from an Openreach copper distribution point to each flat. Here is a pic of the utility room, showing the DP. In the top left, is the Openreach DP with the 6 cat5e cables coming out, they are only bunched up for like 3 metres and then it's about 10 meters, maybe less, to my master socket (the rest of the stuff you see is TV aerials and some kind of SkyQ equipment that was recently installed. I dont think any of that affects it though as I would see problems all day long I would of thought? Why the developers did it this way, when we all have our own outside front doors, I dont know :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="utilityroom-min.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67904i8D198015912982D2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="utilityroom-min.jpg" alt="utilityroom-min.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand some congestion is going to happen, but I would of thought it should be within a certain percentage. I'm not sure what BT even counts as a congested SVLAN. Maybe this is OK to them? Or maybe this congestion is on Openreach equipment, I have no idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had another look at the actual cabinet I'm connected to. It has a large PCP cabinet with what I assume is a g.fast pod on the side of it and then the FTTC cabinet is just behind that, it's the Huawei 288 /384HD, that's the one I'm on as it has the number printed on it. Then about 10 meters away is another smaller FTTC cabinet, a Huawei 96/128. So there must be lots of users for the one PCP cabinet as I actually only just noticed the second FTTC cabinet recently. Does anyone know the bandwidth capacity of the fibre link from the FTTC cabinet to the exchange? Surely it's enough to not cause congestion there? Or it would be picked up on, I would of thought.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also ruled out the possibility of it actually being my PC, by using other devices to test also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand there is procedures in place for getting something like this fixed, but to me it's pretty obvious congestion, rather than a line fault or crosstalk. From what others have said, if it was crosstalk, then it would show a lower sync speed in the router stats, but it actually says 55mb and max 73mb. Noise margin seems stable, even after re-syncs and no noise on the telephone quiet line test now. I've tried my best to give the best proof of this as possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BT are saying there isn't any congestion, so what can I do? Can I request to be moved to a different SVLAN anyway? Or is there some cabinet or other equipment that needs checking?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would love to know how the BT congestion reports are made, like are they over a 24 hour period and then averaged out? If it was done this way, it would show low congestion, as daytime speeds are fine. I have seen in the Plusnet forums, a case where the SVLAN reports came back as congestion free, the customer and mod team persisted and some kind of QC team did further testing and found that actually it was congested and they moved the customer to a less congested SVLAN, problem was solved. For example &lt;A href="https://aastatus.net/1890" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://aastatus.net/1890&lt;/A&gt; (I know this is old 2014) but it shows the point, that BT came back saying SVLAN, no congestion, then upon further inspection, found out it was actually the MSE that caused the congestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something else I noticed that is strange is that in in the BT wholesale speed test report it says "For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 27.5-50.67 Mbps" It never used to say 27.5, this has been added after repeated tests, it used to be a lot higher. So this seems to update itself from previous tests. I'm also not sure why 27.5 is acceptable, the DSL checker shows a downstream handback threshold of 48mb, even on an impacted line, if BT think 27mb is acceptable, then they must think going from 50 to 27 during congestion is also acceptable, that's a 40%+ decrease in throughput speed, do they really allow that kind of decreases during congestion. I would of thought 20% would be enough for them to find an issue and I checked Ofcom stats and it's usually only like 10% or less of a loss during congestion on average. This range also differs from the range advertised when ordering the package and BT are supposed to be applying the new Ofcom rules that state the advertised range of speeds should reflect peak time congestion (maybe they didn't have this data yet though I guess).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="dslchecker.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67905i5E51FA14F33A4C49/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="dslchecker.png" alt="dslchecker.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The DSL checker is actually wrong though about FTTP and my status, although our area is FTTP ready, I'm an MDU not a single dwelling. Not sure why it thinks I'm single dwelling, maybe because I have my own outside facing front door. Currently trying to get Openreach to get permission from the freeholder to install FTTP, but that's another story and will most likely take months as Openreach said there is a delay at the moment for contacting freeholders. They have created a full record though and said it will be done as soon as possible. The DSL checker does show an observed speed in 2019 of 80/20 though, this was before I had problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reading this far, I'm basically looking for any advice from other users, that may have some knowledge of this kind of problem. If the engineer comes back and says line is good (he's coming in the morning next week so I'm going to go ahead and say that he wont find any problems), what can I and BT do? I know it's possible now for ISP's to request a SVLAN move, I'm just not sure if they need more than what I have already provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit: I also forgot to mention, I just tried a VPN (NordVPN) to see if a routing change, would change anything. The answer is no, exactly the same problem except speeds were even worse as expected, so I guess that rules out the BT core network, I tried the VPN the other day off-peak and speeds were around 48mb. Here is the trace routes like above but using the VPN instead:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [151.101.192.81]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 6 ms 6 ms 7 ms 10.7.2.1&lt;BR /&gt;2 22 ms 31 ms 33 ms cs0-cr.ldn.as25369.net [5.226.141.129]&lt;BR /&gt;3 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms ae2.31-rt1-cr.ldn.as25369.net [185.38.150.226]&lt;BR /&gt;4 7 ms 8 ms 8 ms ae1.rt0-thn2.ldn.as25369.net [5.226.136.38]&lt;BR /&gt;5 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms ip81-59.fastly-gw1.lonap.net [5.57.81.59]&lt;BR /&gt;6 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 151.101.192.81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tracing route to google.com [216.58.210.238]&lt;BR /&gt;over a maximum of 30 hops:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.7.2.1&lt;BR /&gt;2 29 ms 38 ms 25 ms cs0-cr.ldn.as25369.net [5.226.141.129]&lt;BR /&gt;3 7 ms 9 ms 7 ms ae2.31-rt1-cr.ldn.as25369.net [185.38.150.226]&lt;BR /&gt;4 15 ms 13 ms 14 ms ae2.rt0-hex.ldn.as25369.net [5.226.136.16]&lt;BR /&gt;5 17 ms 29 ms 14 ms ae3-224.cr5-lon2.ip4.gtt.net [77.67.82.245]&lt;BR /&gt;6 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms ae22.cr10-lon1.ip4.gtt.net [89.149.185.49]&lt;BR /&gt;7 27 ms 26 ms 25 ms 72.14.221.145&lt;BR /&gt;8 11 ms 14 ms 13 ms 209.85.249.187&lt;BR /&gt;9 32 ms 73 ms 72 ms 172.253.68.213&lt;BR /&gt;10 9 ms 10 ms 11 ms lhr48s12-in-f14.1e100.net [216.58.210.238]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trace complete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 21:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-21T21:00:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2079973#M1203639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently on the 50mb package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My router stats are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTtitleFont"&gt;Data rate:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTregularFont"&gt;9.997 Mbps / 55 Mbps&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTtitleFont"&gt;Maximum data rate:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTregularFont"&gt;22.750 Mbps / 73.394 Mbps&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTtitleFont"&gt;Noise margin:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTregularFont"&gt;13.9 / 10.6&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTtitleFont"&gt;Line attenuation:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTregularFont"&gt;8.5 / 16.9&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTtitleFont"&gt;Signal attenuation:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="BTregularFont"&gt;8.5 / 19.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;During the day my speeds are great, 50mb down, 10mb up. When it hits 5pm onwards, it drops to 20-25mb down but upload stays the same, maybe a little slower.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I opened a fault and it did the test and said my speeds were below the minimum and I had the right to exit. Then on the fault tracker it said:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;"Right to exit removed&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ng-scope"&gt;We’ve had to remove your right to exit your contract without penalty, as we’ve not been able to monitor your speed or get any required information from you."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fault tracker now says the fault has been fixed but it hasn't. I just want a stable connection through the evening. What are my options here now that they have closed the fault and why did it say "Right to exit removed"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems really hard to get this sorted as there doesn't seem to actually be anything wrong with my line, the daytime is fine. It's just peak time congestion it seems. But it still falls well below the 40mb download speed guarantee in the evenings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2079973#M1203639</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T12:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080049#M1203640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;there is no guarantee on download speeds&amp;nbsp; any guarantee is on connection speed&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you run btspeedtester when download speed is ok and post results and then run again when poor and post result&amp;nbsp; must be done using ethernet cable not wireless&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.speedtest.btwholesale.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.speedtest.btwholesale.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;which exchange and cab are you on&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.broadbandchecker.btwholesale.com/#/ADSL" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.broadbandchecker.btwholesale.com/#/ADSL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 14:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080049#M1203640</guid>
      <dc:creator>imjolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T14:56:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080058#M1203641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply. I think BT now check actual throughput speed rather than just sync speed on the stay fast guarantee, via their speed checker. It's something to do with the new Ofcom rules and I only just signed up. On this page &lt;A href="https://www.bt.com/help/broadband/what-is-bt-s-stay-fast-guarantee-" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.bt.com/help/broadband/what-is-bt-s-stay-fast-guarantee-&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"We check the throughput speed to your Hub - the speed at which you can actually send and receive data. It's what you experience at home when using your broadband connection." I think the part above is more about WiFi and in house wiring and I guess it applies to when you do the "Further Diagnostics" and they do the tap1-3 or something. Not sure how else they check the throughput without using a customers own devices otherwise.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm going to do those speed tests every couple of hours just to see the differences and will then post them here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My exchange is NDSIT and I'm on cabinet 54&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also for what it's worth, I've already got the extension wiring disconnected and will be testing via ethernet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again for your help&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080058#M1203641</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T15:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080211#M1203642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok so actually when I do the BT speed tester they all come out at 40+mb download. The problem comes when I'm streaming on a single UDP/TCP connection, for example Google Stadia. It can't manage 20mb download.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The speed tests do go down a little overall, but using a TCPViewer on my PC I can see that the BT speed tester uses multiple TCP and UDP connections to reach it's top speed. My guess is QoS at the exchange or cab is picking up retransmissions on each TCP/UDP connection and then throttling the speed of each to keep it stable, as the BT speed tester uses multiple connections, it hides the congestion. I also see lots of dropped connections and warnings in Stadia about unstable connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I did a test on thinkbroadband, that allows single threaded and multithreaded tests. This was the result,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1596832976532626855" style="width: 316px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67559i36A3E8B03225749E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="1596832976532626855" alt="1596832976532626855" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The single threaded connection is getting throttled back.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems like congestion and maybe somewhere in the exchange it is seeing lots of retransmissions and is pulling back single connections? I have done the same TBB test during the day and both single threaded and multi threaded download speeds are the same, so it is purely peak time congestion problems. I live alone, so I know for a fact I only have the one ethernet connected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I go about sorting this out? It seems like clear congestion issues to me and the phone staff don't really understand what I mean and only see the multi connection speed test that fills the entire pipe regardless of packet loss. The latency on that test also shows there must be packet loss going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this something BT will pick up on, or can I email someone or have a mod that knows what I'm on about, help me out? Maybe I'm on a congested SVLAN at the exchange or something, or maybe there is work due to upgrade the equipment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the BT speed test at the same time as the above TBB test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="thisoneping.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67560i1498B43B89FCB6F2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="thisoneping.png" alt="thisoneping.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It does show a high ping. But as it uses multiple TCP connections, it can reach the 41mb speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is one from 4PM with lower ping and higher speeds:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="speedtest4pm.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67561i546568F46104E707/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="speedtest4pm.png" alt="speedtest4pm.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Streaming netflix and youtube seems fine because they are using multiple TCP connections , but anything UDP and it's a no go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stadia's own speed test also uses a single TCP connection to test speed and this was the result:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="stadia.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67562i7D99E7F3E68B13AE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="stadia.png" alt="stadia.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to double check, I used speedtest.net and did a multi download and single download test. First is the multi download test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ookla1.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67565i1393E4D048DB24EA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ookla1.png" alt="ookla1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ookla2.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67566iC99E86D28B40897E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ookla2.png" alt="ookla2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I understand that a single threaded download can be slightly slower, but on a non congested line, it should manage the 40-50mb and it does in fact during off-peak times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both are actually below my estimate, but it is peak time. I basically need the minimum speed guarentee of 40mb that I was told when I signed up and I have no idea what to do as it's only peak times that I have issues. Even a stable 30mb on a single UDP would work, I get 50mb during the day on all tests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try to remember to do some tests in the morning to proof my point of the single vs multi threaded speeds being the same during off-peak times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks everyone&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 21:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080211#M1203642</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T21:31:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080216#M1203643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only speed BT guarantee is conenction speed not throughput/download speed &amp;nbsp; The stayfast gurantee actually says it is the speed to your hub not the speed from hub to your devices&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the only test BT &amp;nbsp;are interested in is the results from &amp;nbsp;BTSPEEDTESTER &amp;nbsp;using Ethernet cable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know BT keep referring to download speed in the literature but that is qualified in the T&amp;amp;C that download actually is connection to the hub&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;your btspeedtester speed look ok for 55mb connection&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 21:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080216#M1203643</guid>
      <dc:creator>imjolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-07T21:57:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080225#M1203644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I understand what you are saying, but I do think BT are using a throughput/download speed test to the hub itself. How it's done I don't know, I assume with updated firmware on the Smart Hub 2 and only when you carry out the BT troublesshooter/speed test. I could be completely wrong and maybe this only applies to a selection of customers and I happen to be one of them. I might try a troubleshooter and see if anything pops up in the router logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Ofcom rules are here &lt;A href="https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/information-for-industry/codes-of-practice" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/information-for-industry/codes-of-practice&lt;/A&gt; and BT have agreed to them for contracts taken out from March 2019 onwards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All I know is that my router stats showed a download rate of 55mb and when I went through their troubleshooter they offered me the right to exit if it wasn't fixed in 30 days, because my speed given by the troubleshooter was less than 40mb. The router sync rate always stayed the same (55mb), they purely used the speed tester results + tap1-3. That particular fault was fixed, which is why I'm guessing it's always over 40mb now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You're right the BT tests looks fine, but single TCP/UDP connections should not be that much lower than a x3 download speed and it does show congestion at peak times. Especially with high latency like that. I think it was a big mistake by Ofcom to allow ISP's to use multiple connections to measure the real download speed, as it does hide congestion. Before BT, I was with TT and on the 80/20 package and getting about 74down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an example, compare this test result of single and multi download tests to the ones earlier during peak times:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both a single connection and a multiple connection would give me the same speed, so no packets getting delayed and forcing TCP to slow down, congestion is almost gone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1596845479844894755" style="width: 316px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67569i7BC017861D192CC3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="1596845479844894755" alt="1596845479844894755" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also understand I'm giving non BT speed test results to show my problems, but the BT speed tester does not do single threaded download connections, it will use 4-6 threads to get the max possible download speed and that is unfair for those using single UDP connections and it also does hide congested lines to the customer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know BT are part of &lt;A href="https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/111697/annex-5-testing-principles.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/111697/annex-5-testing-principles.pdf&lt;/A&gt; and I'm sure in a year or so these sort of problems will be a thing of the past.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I'm still giving clear examples of congestion and currently there is no way for me to talk to anyone about the issue and that's why I'm hoping a mod will understand and get the exchange checked and see if the SVLAN I'm connected to is running hot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apreciate you letting me know about the guarantee though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 00:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080225#M1203644</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-08T00:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080711#M1203645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just did another speed test using both the BT.com website and the BT wholesale speed test. Both of them fail the stay fast guarentee of 40mb when I signed up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I only get bad speeds during peak hours. I live alone and have noone else downloading anything, I have checked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fault checker at first said that the speed was bad and then I continued to the next page and it said my speeds look great and closed the page. Really annoyed me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is some screenshots:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first was the BT.com troubleshooter that clearly says there is a problem:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="1.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67588iC6F0CE823B77E8B9/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1.png" alt="1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Then I get this? And the fault goes green and says everything is OK and right to exit removed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://imgur.com/XL5Hw8t" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BT Troubleshooter Account not linked.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67584i34F348D96EA983D9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BT Troubleshooter Account not linked.png" alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BT Troubleshooter Account not linked.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is another test I found that showws the high packet retransmissions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Visualware Assessment Cloud Report.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67585i0ADCE42BD1F729D9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Visualware Assessment Cloud Report.png" alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Visualware Assessment Cloud Report.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BTW Performance Tester.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67587iA4DD5A2D4048328D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BTW Performance Tester.png" alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 BTW Performance Tester.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Your broadband My BT.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67589iA2CB1F4A6A54347F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Your broadband My BT.png" alt="Screenshot_2020-08-09 Your broadband My BT.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And here is the ThinkBroadband test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1597004037586367255" style="width: 316px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67590iFDCA9E43424C7E0E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="1597004037586367255" alt="1597004037586367255" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have no idea what is happening here and really need some help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 20:44:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2080711#M1203645</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-09T20:44:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081088#M1203646</link>
      <description>Anyone know how I can get a mod involved with this?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:08:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081088#M1203646</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-11T00:08:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081181#M1203647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.bt.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/191381"&gt;@scottrc&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you for posting. I'm sorry you've been experiencing a slowdown during peak times. If you send me your details, I'll be able to run a few checks on the network.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have sent you a private message with instructions on how to contact me.&amp;nbsp; You can access your messages via the envelope icon at the top right of the screen, or click on this link,&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.bt.com/t5/notes/privatenotespage" target="_blank"&gt;Private messages&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;PaddyB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081181#M1203647</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaddyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-11T10:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081184#M1203648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you need to run btspeedtester with ethernet connection when throughput/download speed appears good and then another run when speed is at worst&amp;nbsp; also need exchange and cab if you have not already posted that info&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;then see what the stats look like&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081184#M1203648</guid>
      <dc:creator>imjolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-11T10:32:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081210#M1203649</link>
      <description>Will do those two speed tests on Sat, I work late evenings so will be unable to do so until the weekend.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081210#M1203649</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-11T11:08:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081211#M1203650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thats ok&amp;nbsp; it will also help mods&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2081211#M1203650</guid>
      <dc:creator>imjolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-11T11:14:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082002#M1203651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, someone suggested I did a quiet line test at the test socket using my corded phone. I did it and there is like a popping noise, like "pop, pop, pop" every half a second or so. Also there was crackling when picking up the phone. Would this affect peak time speeds in anyway or are these kind of noise problems phone call based only? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:53:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082002#M1203651</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-12T21:53:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082009#M1203652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any noise on the line could affect your broadband though it won't be the cause of your peaktime reduction. Report a noisey line.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 23:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082009#M1203652</guid>
      <dc:creator>pippincp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-12T23:14:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082013#M1203653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks will do. Also do you know what bandwidth or fibre link speed they put to each FTTC cabinet? Is it possible for the congestion to be at the cabinet if it happens to be full? Like does it have a 10gbs fibre link to the exchange or less do you think? Only reason I ask is because I've had this peak time speed issue with TalkTalk and BT. Only just changed to BT. Obviously there is a chance both suppliers are having congestion issues at the exchange though. But would like to rule out the cab if I can. My cab is one of those all in one types, with a g.fast pod on the side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also just realised, this problem all started after they enabled FTTP orders in my area.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082013#M1203653</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T00:46:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082014#M1203654</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is impossilbe to have congestion at they cab. FTTP goes nowhere near a cab and is served from an aggregation node.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 01:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082014#M1203654</guid>
      <dc:creator>pippincp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T01:18:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082053#M1203655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No I don't have FTTP, its just installed in the area. I'm on FTTC. I can't get full fibre yet as I'm an MDU and waiting for the freeholder to give openreach permission to install.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the FTTC cabs for FTTC customers should be able to handle all the connections without congestion, even if they are maxed out? I'm finding conflicting info on the web, so asking here. Some say they have a 10gbs link to the exchange and some say 1gbs link. I'm guessing mine is the big one with 288 connections maybe more with the extra gfast pod. I guess what I'm saying is, if let's say 200 of the houses were using Netflix at the same time, would it cause congestion at the cab.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082053#M1203655</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T08:35:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082109#M1203656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The cab has enough capacirty for every connection to run at max.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082109#M1203656</guid>
      <dc:creator>pippincp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T10:03:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082165#M1203657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK cool thanks. Do you know if they put vectoring in cabs now? I do have one with a g.fast pod on the side&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082165#M1203657</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T12:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Peaktime throughput speeds less than half minimum speed guarantee.</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082170#M1203658</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not, they don't use vectoring, G.INP is used instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Archive-Staging/Peaktime-throughput-speeds-less-than-half-minimum-speed/m-p/2082170#M1203658</guid>
      <dc:creator>pippincp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-13T12:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

