<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This topic</title>
    <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399799#M356353</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your quote a desktop quote , to give a ballpark figure or the paid for survey that’s the basis of contractual quote , so you have paid around £300 already ? , with FTTPod there is a free desktop survey , and if the costs are not off-putting , you pay for a ‘proper’ survey .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;If a free desktop survey , then it’s possible that although you reside in a DIG area , at some point in the past , to restore copper pair service , a new duct and cable were installed to get around a fault on the buried cable , this wouldn’t be known at a desktop survey, but that’s why a desktop survey is just a guide to the likely cost , not a contractual price .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it’s based on a ‘paid for’ survey , AFAIK, the costings are not &amp;nbsp;broken down into individual sections, like footpath to house , so if your ‘garden’ were ( for example ) 10m in soft and 1m in footway , it would simply be included in the entire excavation quote , so if ( for argument sake ) a further 30m in soft some distance away from your address were also needed , and an extra 49m in footway , remote from your house , the quote would be for 40m soft and 50m footway in total , you wouldn’t know the way those totals were broken down .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it’s a desktop survey price , and you subsequently pay for a bespoke survey, if the duct that exists was overlooked, then a reduction may be made , but it’s just as likely that the ‘real’ survey would uncover costs that were not part of the desktop quote .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-09T15:43:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OR reports Direct In Ground but we see a duct</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399796#M356352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hoping you might be able to help. Understand this isn’t an OR forum (and BT consumer is separate) but I thought folks here might have knowledge. I have FTTC currently and am trying to get FTTP installed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on an FTTP On Demand desk survey I have been told that my property is fed by a Direct In Ground feed. On the outside of the house I can see a BT66 junction box as well as a grey plastic type going down into the ground from it. When digging down I see it goes down further than my 20cm hole in the ground. On the pavement outside the property I see BT branded manhole cover that I assume my phone line goes into.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is - could the OR survey be wrong? Could I actually be fed by a duct from the manhole cover and OR need to update their records? If so would that affect the quote that I got back from FTTPoD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399796#M356352</guid>
      <dc:creator>lbres</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-09T15:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OR reports Direct In Ground but we see a duct</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399799#M356353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your quote a desktop quote , to give a ballpark figure or the paid for survey that’s the basis of contractual quote , so you have paid around £300 already ? , with FTTPod there is a free desktop survey , and if the costs are not off-putting , you pay for a ‘proper’ survey .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;If a free desktop survey , then it’s possible that although you reside in a DIG area , at some point in the past , to restore copper pair service , a new duct and cable were installed to get around a fault on the buried cable , this wouldn’t be known at a desktop survey, but that’s why a desktop survey is just a guide to the likely cost , not a contractual price .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it’s based on a ‘paid for’ survey , AFAIK, the costings are not &amp;nbsp;broken down into individual sections, like footpath to house , so if your ‘garden’ were ( for example ) 10m in soft and 1m in footway , it would simply be included in the entire excavation quote , so if ( for argument sake ) a further 30m in soft some distance away from your address were also needed , and an extra 49m in footway , remote from your house , the quote would be for 40m soft and 50m footway in total , you wouldn’t know the way those totals were broken down .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it’s a desktop survey price , and you subsequently pay for a bespoke survey, if the duct that exists was overlooked, then a reduction may be made , but it’s just as likely that the ‘real’ survey would uncover costs that were not part of the desktop quote .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399799#M356353</guid>
      <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-09T15:43:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OR reports Direct In Ground but we see a duct</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399829#M356358</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was the free quote part of FTTPoD. The quote was for around £24K which is very off putting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, this is very helpful, thank you. Sounds like I’m kind of screwed for a little while until OR come back to deal with DIG properties like this, or I can pay the £300 for a more in depth survey with no guarantee on cost reductions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 17:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/OR-reports-Direct-In-Ground-but-we-see-a-duct/m-p/2399829#M356358</guid>
      <dc:creator>lbres</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-09T17:42:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

