<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This topic</title>
    <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436524#M360919</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I cannot understand how the proxy associated with "Multicast-Assisted Unicast Delivery" would be using self assigned certificates, and it certainly shouldn't be relying on the same from an end-users device!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not a business query, it's a streaming query, and a very strange one at that!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 21:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Crimliar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-20T21:51:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proxy.maud.bt.com</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436378#M360908</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;proxy.maud.bt.com is removing support for self-signed certificates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;More:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server#Transparent_proxy" target="_blank"&gt;Proxy server - Wikipedia&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please fix immediately&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436378#M360908</guid>
      <dc:creator>booscreenofdef</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-19T10:10:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proxy.maud.bt.com</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436487#M360917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN style="background: var(--ck-color-mention-background); color: var(--ck-color-mention-text);"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.bt.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/345930"&gt;@booscreenofdef&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Welcome to the community.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is above my level of understanding with this kind of thing, but I'll see if I can get someone to look into it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you give me a little more information about what this is impacting for you? It should help narrow down who I can raise it with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436487#M360917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-20T16:48:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proxy.maud.bt.com</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436493#M360918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think no one has responded because there is insufficient detail to understand what the OP is asking.&amp;nbsp; It also reads like a business query.&amp;nbsp; If so, it would perhaps be better posted on the business forum?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A self-sighed cert is only valid within your own network anyway, so surely you would expect a third-party like BT to reject it?&amp;nbsp; Presumably, I’m missing something here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436493#M360918</guid>
      <dc:creator>WSH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-20T17:43:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proxy.maud.bt.com</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436524#M360919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I cannot understand how the proxy associated with "Multicast-Assisted Unicast Delivery" would be using self assigned certificates, and it certainly shouldn't be relying on the same from an end-users device!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not a business query, it's a streaming query, and a very strange one at that!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 21:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436524#M360919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Crimliar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-20T21:51:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proxy.maud.bt.com</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436525#M360920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, MAUD’s a new one on me but from a quick read, it sounds like an overdue solution.&amp;nbsp; If it’s running as a proxy to cache streaming content then, presumably, the self-signed certificate is from a client accessing it from within its own network, so it makes a bit more sense now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Said I was missing something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit: From what I’ve just read, MAUD is a brand new thing developed by BT and still under test, so presumably BT supplied the proxy and this is an error it’s thrown?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 22:34:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre-broadband/proxy-maud-bt-com/m-p/2436525#M360920</guid>
      <dc:creator>WSH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-20T22:34:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

