<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This topic</title>
    <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426255#M176337</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;142Mb , must be Gfast or FTTP , if you are FTTP then you get the headline speed , there is no distance related reduction , if you once could get Gfast , but it’s no longer a portfolio product , considering Gfast was only available to those with very short lines from the PCP , your FTTC speed should be pretty decent as you should be pretty close to the cabinet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TBH , I don’t really see the issue , if you want FTTC , the speed you get is related to the distance you are from the cabinet, not the MSG , the NSG is only relevant with defective lines , the minimum speed guarantee makes no difference to that , your line is either OK or it isn’t .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If &amp;nbsp; won’t commit to taking FTTC because the MSG is significantly lower than the speed you almost certainly will get , rather than being around 10% lower than the sync speed , don’t purchase FTTC , it’s unclear what you are actually expecting .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-28T12:57:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426222#M176321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am in the process of changing to fibre 2.&amp;nbsp; Within the contract I have been quoted a stay fast guarantee of 34Mbps whereas on the BT web site it states 62Mb (see below).&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know why there is a discrepancy?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Cappi_0-1740732368278.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.bt.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/86342i18B0E79950A51505/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Cappi_0-1740732368278.png" alt="Cappi_0-1740732368278.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also struggling to find a way of communicating with BT in writing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426222#M176321</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cappi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T08:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426226#M176322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The minimum speed guarantee to a certain extent is irrelevant, the actual speed you get is almost entirely dependent on the distance you are from the cabinet, so assuming no defects on the line , the customer equipment and internal wiring etc , if the &amp;nbsp;line were capable of (for example) 70Mb , that what your line syncs at , irrespective if the MSG being 60Mb or 30Mb , it’s not like the speed is restricted to the MSG , it’s simply a threshold at which a problem can be investigated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only issue would be is if your line was delivering 70 and then developed a problem dropping the speed to 50 , with &amp;nbsp;a MSG of 30 , you may struggle to get a speed issue looked at by the provider as it’s still above the MSG , but if the MSG were 60, then 50 is obviously lower and triggers a response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as the difference, if you had a line in service, it is generating real performance data , so the mathematical model /calculation of the line performance is superseded with real data &amp;nbsp;, if the user of that line were ( for arguments sake ) using their router on the end of a cheap extension cord and that was negatively impacting the performance &amp;nbsp;, or the line had an unreported problem that reduced the speed but it was unnoticeable ( so was never reported or fixed ) the MSG would be lowered reflecting the real data that indicates a slower sync rate , if that person stop using the defective extension, or the underlying fault repaired, the line speed improves and the MSG increases in line with the increased real world data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426226#M176322</guid>
      <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T09:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426247#M176333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, however I am troubled by the contract stating 34Mb whereas the advertised is 62Mb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:23:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426247#M176333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cappi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T12:23:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426248#M176334</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.bt.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/305246"&gt;@Cappi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you are changing (upgrading?) to fibre 2 what speed do you currently have?&amp;nbsp; the 62mb in the advertisement is an example for a customer getting a connection speed of 70mb+.&amp;nbsp; the lower your connection speed the lower stayfast guarantee&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426248#M176334</guid>
      <dc:creator>imjolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T12:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426250#M176336</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;142Mb&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:42:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426250#M176336</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cappi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T12:42:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stay fast guarantee</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426255#M176337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;142Mb , must be Gfast or FTTP , if you are FTTP then you get the headline speed , there is no distance related reduction , if you once could get Gfast , but it’s no longer a portfolio product , considering Gfast was only available to those with very short lines from the PCP , your FTTC speed should be pretty decent as you should be pretty close to the cabinet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TBH , I don’t really see the issue , if you want FTTC , the speed you get is related to the distance you are from the cabinet, not the MSG , the NSG is only relevant with defective lines , the minimum speed guarantee makes no difference to that , your line is either OK or it isn’t .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If &amp;nbsp; won’t commit to taking FTTC because the MSG is significantly lower than the speed you almost certainly will get , rather than being around 10% lower than the sync speed , don’t purchase FTTC , it’s unclear what you are actually expecting .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Bills-Packages/Stay-fast-guarantee/m-p/2426255#M176337</guid>
      <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-28T12:57:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

