<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This topic</title>
    <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240316#M84960</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The second pair may well last forever ( or until FTTP comes along ) so to pay to replace a cable just so that it has a spare pair that may never be needed would be the economics of the mad house .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something that makes no sense though , if your &amp;nbsp;lead in cable was fine ,( your lead in cable pretty much is from your house , across your garden to a close by point in a public footpath ) where it’s jointed to a larger distribution cable , &amp;nbsp;and the excavation was on a cable that joined onto your lead in cable , then the second pair of your lead in doesn’t need to be used , the first pair is still OK, ( otherwise the excavation would be on your lead in cable ) if the ‘second’ pair is not in your lead in cable , then it’s not a spare pair for you as such , it’s just a spare pair in the larger cable that your lead in cable connects to,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;if that cable is now exhausted, ( for example it is a 10 pair cable and has now 9 working lines and one faulty one , your old pair ) if any other of the 8 customers ( 9 including you ) had a similar fault then the cable would have to be replaced, but you don’t replace a cable to provide a spare pair…time will tell if they made the choice , but it’s definitely the correct policy .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you have misinterpreted what was done , and it is the second pair of your lead in that was used because the first pair was faulty , and the excavation happened to be in the public footpath but still on your lead in cable , then to replace this cable would require an excavation from that point all the way to your house , most wouldn’t want the upheaval for what would be unnecessary work just to restore service , all this excavation would be for would be to provide some probably never needed redundancy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 10:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-09T10:54:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240304#M84956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We had an issue with our phone line last year where our broadband was working fine but we couldnt get dial tone and couldnt make phone calls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OR came out and identified a physical fault with one of the cables of the main pair being used to supply our connection. Despite bringing out a multitude of equipment, they were unable to locate the route the cable took to enter my property to repair the line fault.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a result they excavated the footpath further up our street and switched us over to the "spare pair" on the line that runs to our house. At the time I asked the engineer what would happen in the future if this spare pair were to develop a fault and he said it would mean a new physical line (and digging up our driveway etc to route it to the house).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, should this fault have been considered fully resolved, or should a follow on job have been raised for a new line at that point - ie the fix they implemented should have been considered a temporary fix to restore service but not a long term fix?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 09:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240304#M84956</guid>
      <dc:creator>jumpman23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T09:01:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240309#M84959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as the bean counters are concerned, it is a legitimate long term fix.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Depending on the location and cause of the original fault, it could be a long term fix or it might not be.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Either way, you won't get Openreach back until/if the second pair goes faulty.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 09:27:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240309#M84959</guid>
      <dc:creator>licquorice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T09:27:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240316#M84960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The second pair may well last forever ( or until FTTP comes along ) so to pay to replace a cable just so that it has a spare pair that may never be needed would be the economics of the mad house .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something that makes no sense though , if your &amp;nbsp;lead in cable was fine ,( your lead in cable pretty much is from your house , across your garden to a close by point in a public footpath ) where it’s jointed to a larger distribution cable , &amp;nbsp;and the excavation was on a cable that joined onto your lead in cable , then the second pair of your lead in doesn’t need to be used , the first pair is still OK, ( otherwise the excavation would be on your lead in cable ) if the ‘second’ pair is not in your lead in cable , then it’s not a spare pair for you as such , it’s just a spare pair in the larger cable that your lead in cable connects to,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;if that cable is now exhausted, ( for example it is a 10 pair cable and has now 9 working lines and one faulty one , your old pair ) if any other of the 8 customers ( 9 including you ) had a similar fault then the cable would have to be replaced, but you don’t replace a cable to provide a spare pair…time will tell if they made the choice , but it’s definitely the correct policy .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you have misinterpreted what was done , and it is the second pair of your lead in that was used because the first pair was faulty , and the excavation happened to be in the public footpath but still on your lead in cable , then to replace this cable would require an excavation from that point all the way to your house , most wouldn’t want the upheaval for what would be unnecessary work just to restore service , all this excavation would be for would be to provide some probably never needed redundancy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 10:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240316#M84960</guid>
      <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T10:54:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240322#M84961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the responses &lt;a href="https://community.bt.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/79043"&gt;@iniltous&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.bt.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/85653"&gt;@licquorice&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the 2nd pair out of action, what would happen in the circumstance that I wanted an additional phone line?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand OR typically provision this on the spare pair, so if I ordered an additional line and the 2nd pair couldnt be used, who would be liable for the cost of an additional line? Would I just have to pay the standard install fee or would I liable for the full cost of installation (ie digging up my driveway etc).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 11:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240322#M84961</guid>
      <dc:creator>jumpman23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T11:24:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240327#M84962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No clear cut answer , BT have a universal service obligation ( USO ) to provide service to anyone who reasonably requires it , the USO is satisfied by your existing line , if you ordered a second service, and that was accepted by a provider ( BT or anyone else ) your contract would be with them , but Openreach are ultimately the network &amp;nbsp;supplier, not BT , &amp;nbsp;if OR said that as the property is already served and it’s not viable to get a second service at the usual installation cost, &amp;nbsp;they could in effect expect the construction costs are met ( there wouldn’t be any USO £3400 contribution towards the overall cost ) and should cancel the order and expect the Telco ( BT or whoever ) to see if the consumer wanted to proceed on this you pay for it basis , but as far as any ‘guarantee’ BT offer , delivering service by a particular date or a &amp;nbsp;per day compensation figure for any days after this missed appointment is anyone guess, some are &amp;nbsp;given ridiculous amounts of compensation that in no way reflect the actual loss, and others that simply are told to pay up or go away.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No one has a right to a second line, &amp;nbsp;If it can be done and is commercially sensible that’s one thing , expecting &amp;nbsp;potentially £1000’s to be spent at no cost to the individual ordering the second service is another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case , it’s unclear if the ‘spare’ pair in your lead in is OK or not….if it were your lead in that had a fault and it were inside your curtilage, you would have to agree to excavation to find and repair the fault , that may concentrate the mind as to if the second service is actually needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 12:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240327#M84962</guid>
      <dc:creator>iniltous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T12:21:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dial tone fault "fixed" by moving to 2nd pair - long term fix or bodge?</title>
      <link>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240335#M84963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you really need a second line the best way to find out is order a second line and keep this post updated how you get on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 13:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.bt.com/t5/Home-phone-including-Digital/Dial-tone-fault-quot-fixed-quot-by-moving-to-2nd-pair-long-term/m-p/2240335#M84963</guid>
      <dc:creator>gg30340</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-09T13:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

