cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Brandscill
Aspiring Expert
518 Views
Message 131 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

It's improved but it's far from fixed from what I can tell. Still times out (albeit far less) and it's still slower than usual.
0 Ratings
sictr
Aspiring Contributor
495 Views
Message 132 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

I'm on the Dover Exchange. 

 

The delayed loading appears to have gone.  However, my download speeds are currently around 30-40mbps down at the moment.  Will check again later. 

0 Ratings
HHGTTG
Expert
489 Views
Message 133 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

I know that I'm tempting fate but as of this moment everything appears to be functioning as it did up unitl Saturday morning.

Let's keep on hoping it stays that way. Still wish I knew what was up, though, especailly as it did not make headlines anywhere.

 

Good old creaky BT. Makes gaslight look positively upmarket.

0 Ratings
jbnm
Beginner
483 Views
Message 134 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

Loading of web pages seems much better -- no more hanging during loading.  However, speed tests are awful now -- I'm on Infinity 2 and consistently get 78 down/18 up, and am getting at best 10/10 at the moment.  A BT Wholesale speed test has just come back with 3.4 down/14 up!

0 Ratings
HHGTTG
Expert
473 Views
Message 135 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages


@jbnm wrote:

Loading of web pages seems much better -- no more hanging during loading.  However, speed tests are awful now -- I'm on Infinity 2 and consistently get 78 down/18 up, and am getting at best 10/10 at the moment.  A BT Wholesale speed test has just come back with 3.4 down/14 up!


Oh dear. I'm on good old ADSL and getting 16.5Mb/s download and that's on my Nexus 7 tablet. 

0 Ratings
borderline
Contributor
461 Views
Message 136 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

I'm in London (Chiswick Exchange) and still not improvement... actually this evening has been even worstSmiley Sad

0 Ratings
Brandscill
Aspiring Expert
456 Views
Message 137 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

That was short lived!

 

PING bbc.net.uk (212.58.246.90): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=120.558 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=213.211 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 2

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=236.838 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=218.761 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=77.864 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=209.738 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 7

Request timeout for icmp_seq 8

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=252.568 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=479.642 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=531.739 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=483.607 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=376.634 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=236.771 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=120.949 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=16 ttl=51 time=378.273 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=17 ttl=51 time=602.137 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=18 ttl=51 time=593.677 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=19 ttl=51 time=692.121 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=20 ttl=51 time=622.698 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 21

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=22 ttl=51 time=740.961 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=23 ttl=51 time=669.781 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=24 ttl=51 time=598.987 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=25 ttl=51 time=600.732 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=26 ttl=51 time=392.321 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=27 ttl=51 time=591.132 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 28

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=29 ttl=51 time=266.917 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=30 ttl=51 time=346.949 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 31

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=32 ttl=51 time=549.517 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=33 ttl=51 time=583.770 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=34 ttl=51 time=594.631 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=35 ttl=51 time=459.094 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=36 ttl=51 time=465.309 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=37 ttl=51 time=336.086 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=38 ttl=51 time=266.370 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=39 ttl=51 time=472.907 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=40 ttl=51 time=163.810 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=41 ttl=51 time=271.238 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=42 ttl=51 time=272.183 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=43 ttl=51 time=475.526 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=44 ttl=51 time=174.846 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=45 ttl=51 time=625.325 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=46 ttl=51 time=735.250 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=47 ttl=51 time=275.850 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=48 ttl=51 time=388.976 ms

Request timeout for icmp_seq 49

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=49 ttl=51 time=1004.041 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=50 ttl=51 time=535.833 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=51 ttl=51 time=457.982 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=52 ttl=51 time=685.427 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=53 ttl=51 time=608.280 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=54 ttl=51 time=527.575 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=55 ttl=51 time=450.513 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=56 ttl=51 time=677.565 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=57 ttl=51 time=600.255 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=58 ttl=51 time=519.295 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=59 ttl=51 time=542.243 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=60 ttl=51 time=669.206 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=61 ttl=51 time=589.394 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=62 ttl=51 time=512.698 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=63 ttl=51 time=355.661 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=64 ttl=51 time=531.582 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=65 ttl=51 time=580.932 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=66 ttl=51 time=808.830 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=67 ttl=51 time=731.441 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=68 ttl=51 time=548.592 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=69 ttl=51 time=573.884 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=70 ttl=51 time=559.963 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=71 ttl=51 time=414.536 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=72 ttl=51 time=640.827 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=73 ttl=51 time=869.107 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=74 ttl=51 time=86.739 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=75 ttl=51 time=28.021 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=76 ttl=51 time=28.760 ms

64 bytes from 212.58.246.90: icmp_seq=77 ttl=51 time=28.874 ms

^C

--- bbc.net.uk ping statistics ---

78 packets transmitted, 72 packets received, 7.7% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 28.021/457.421/1004.041/211.653 ms

0 Ratings
scartart
Beginner
416 Views
Message 138 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

everything seems to be back to normal for me. Hopefully I didn't speak too soon.

0 Ratings
_i
Contributor
360 Views
Message 139 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

Intermittantly knackered here.   BT Vision not working. Facebook crawling.

 

Not as knackered as at the weekend, and I'm not seeing huge ping delays anymore, but still nowhere near right...

 

So much for my afternoon optimism...  

 

Edited to add, seems to have been a different glitch rather than a return to the earlier problems.  Given I wasnt seeing the long pings etc, this time, I rebooted  the hh and everything else and it is back to the way it was this afternoon.  Things arent 100% stable still by the looks of it, but definitely a lot further forward since whatever was fixed early this afternoon. 

0 Ratings
Brandscill
Aspiring Expert
348 Views
Message 140 of 167

Re: Slow loading webpages

Still **bleep**ed it seems then! Eagerly await the mods
0 Ratings