I have been a BT customer for over 40 years and am looking for an alternative.
After having put up with broadband speeds of around 2Mbps for two years since moving to my current property I was over the moon when BT finally rolled out FTC to my village. After signing up the engineer came in Jan 2016 and replaced my ancient BT socket with a brand new one. As one of the first to connect - we are about 1-1.5 miles from the cabinet - we were getting speeds of 11.5Mbps using wireless connection to the router a BT supplied Home Hub 5. I didn't mind that I wasn't getting the guaranteed 12Mbps as I though that the convenience of wireless was sufficient for the extremely small loss.
The satisfaction didn't last long. After a few months there was a period when speeds dropped back to the old 2-3Mbps. I contacted BT and the customer service agent said that there was a problem somewhere she would get resolved. After a few days speeds were back up. This has happened a couple of times since.
I check the connection speed regularly and over time the speed has fallen and is now never above 9.3Mbps and often as low as 7.13Mbps. I complained to BT and they have done a line test and say there is a problem and they need to send an engineer who may charge £129.99 if the problem is down to me. I am not falling for this. In previous addresses where I lived I had similar problems and never once has my equipment been found at fault.
The cabling on the outside of the house has been there for over 50 years and it quite likely has deteriorated over time but since I moved in only three years ago and there was no problem in Jan 2016, why should this fall to me? There was no check on the cabling when BT had the new socket fitted but since I was getting near to maximum possible speed wirelessly it can't have been that bad.
Like I said after more than 40 years you'ld think that BT would want to keep me as a customer but it seems that they just want to squeeze another 129.99 out of me instead.
I have started looking at alternatives and its strange that most of them only guarantee a minimum speed 8Mbps which seems to suggest that there is a known issue with BT infrastructure in the area.
Anyone have any suggestions about a reliable alternative?
Solved! Go to Solution.
I wouldn't know how to do that - stats from BT Home Hub 5 that is.
Speedchecker thingy is below VDSL Range A 14.2 high 8.8 Low
Range B 11.4 High 4.2 low.
There are connected houses between me and the cabinet and further away from me. Until a couple of weeks ago I was getting 10.9 regularly Today its dropping to 7.3
Router is connected to Master Socket
is this what you mean
The socket does have a removable front but the only socket inside is one for the phone (has a rounded side) the line from the router goes into its own housing in the front of the socket above the one for the phone. BT engineer in jan 16 said this type is the latest and doesn't need micro filters and the line from the router will only fit in the top socket.
Speed may be just below the lowest but doesn't help when you've had higher speeds and you're paying the highest rate. Even paying BT £5 per month to retain email address (important for me) I could save around £20 per month by switching supplier.
The thing about the engineers is that BT have told me that if they come and the fault is traced to any point inside my property (land not building) from the telegraph pole outside to anywhere including cables on the outside walls of my house, then I will be charged £129.99. Crazy considering there are service providers out there that charge just £29.95 to install a completely new line.
Yes I know that there might be problems but John Lewis supply my phone and Broadband at my holiday caravan and that is slower. They came and installed it when BT couldn't understand why I wanted a new line in a different part of the country and refused to install it because I wasn't cancelling my home line.