If it was as simple as you think it should be it'd be done! Fact is there are regulations & guidelines to follow with everything & yes it's annoying & not the best for you but not much can be done
When the rules serve to reinforce the mistake then the rules are wrong and need to be re-written.
I appreciate the original problem wasn't caused by BT.
My issue is with BT's handling of it since.
With me reporting the fault, BT should have handled everything from that point.
(Maybe that would mean BT Faults placing an 'internal' order to get my service re-instated/replaced).
What happened, though, was that I had to spend time on Saturday placing an order for a new contract.
This order was then cancelled by BT on Tuesday, so I had to spend more time on Tuesday placing a new (identical) order. This, of course, pushed me 3 days further down the list for installation.
On both Saturday and Tuesday I was told delivery would be 14 days but they would speed this up because of the circumstances. After more time on the phone with BT I found that apparently this can't be done.
And why does it need an engineer to visit, since the engineer on Tuesday (hopefully) fixed it?
Surely, given that the line is (hopefully) working and I have a working BT Smarthub 2 the (flexible) approach would be to provide the service ASAP and see if it works . Only if I still had a problem would it need an engineer.
I've already been out of action for 6.5 days (I work from home) and it looks as though it could be a total of 3 weeks (assuming no further issues).
"When the rules serve to reinforce the mistake then the rules are wrong and need to be re-written."
Exactly this 👏👏👏 🙂
And at a risk of repeating myself, the rules that need to be re-written are Ofcom and OTS ‘rules’ , not BT ‘s , BT can’t arbitrarily change them .
I doubt that Ofcom's OTS rules would:-
The issue appears to be more to do with BT's rules and inflexibility than Ofcom.
Obviously you can believe what you want ,
Are you saying the list of points I made would be affected by Ofcom's rules?
What Ofcom rule would, for example, make BT cancel the order BT had me place on Saturday?
As you have obviously made up your mind where the ‘fault’ lies, this is somewhat futile but here goes,
prevent BT Faults handling this issue.
Your service was ceased by Plusnet , this is allowed by Ofcom indeed it’s a their policy that a customer wanting to leave has no need to contact their existing provider to tell them they are leaving , so you would never be contacted except for the ‘sorry you are leaving’ letter , made somewhat redundant by the OTS system reducing the time the new company has to wait to takeover the line , giving no time for you to intervene .
prevent BT Faults placing an internal order to reinstate/replace my lost service
Yes this is prevented , how can BT faults make an internal order on your behalf, on what authority can they act on for you , plus at this point you are not even a customer as the only official status you have is as an ex customer until a provision order is raised to restore your status , irrespective of the cessation of your service being unwanted , a direct action of Plusnet or your neighbours lack of care ….Ofcom are prepared to suffer theses issues in the name of ‘competition’ or ease of switching, otherwise any migration would be two stage , get a code off the company you are leaving , give it to the new company, they check the veracity of the code ….thats how it used to be , Ofcom changed that system to the one we have now .
make BT cancel the order they had me place on Saturday
Probably a mistake based on the assumption that your service could be restored without a visit .
make BT insist on another Openreach engineer's visit, even though one had just been
As far as I’m aware the engineer visiting you was at the behest of PN for your neighbours early life failure , there service was never going to simply start given Plusnet raised the order against your address not your neighbours address , BT have no ‘visibility’ of that PN request for an Openreach visit to rectify what they saw as a failure for their customers service to simply start working , why would BT know what PN are doing
prevent BT Faults giving priority to this issue as a 'fault' rather than a new installation.
Wrong , BT have no more or less ‘priority’ than anyone else , and as explained you couldn’t have a fault raised as you were no longer a customer
insist on replacing working equipment (my router) with new identical equipment.
A procedural quirk , new customer, new equipment.
As stated , you believe what you want to believe, perhaps you think if you were a customer of a different provider , your neighbours incorrectly ordering against your address causing your service to be ceased, would have had a better outcome , we’ll never know.