That doesn’t look good but also non standard , the second image is limited , you would normally have ‘a connector bend’ which you can see, a ‘capping 25’ connected to it, and a ‘cover 101’ this covers the hole where the cable goes from outside to inside , the first image of a grey duct entering through what looks like a tiled floor is not what OR do, so presumably this was either the developers own idea , or ( It’s unclear if the home is brand new, or just new to you ) the original occupant asked for this arrangements , so that instead of having surface wiring on the internal wall , opposite connector bend , ( the ‘internal’ wiring which would normally be visible) asked for it to be hidden in that non standard ‘tubing’.
TBH, these days chances are, instead of being on the internal side of an external wall , the service is required more centrally within the property ( like an under-stairs cupboard ) where the developer has installed an Ethernet patch panel etc, the problem is getting from the external wall where the OR duct appears, into the ‘middle’ of the property , obviously if the builder provides a duct OR use it, but should there be a problem in the future, ( your service off and this this internal duct arrangement needs attention ) , who is responsible for it ?, it could mean excavating the floor of the property, or reinstalling on the wall opposite the duct , making the Ethernet patch panel unusable.
As already stated, I would be surprised if that was done by OR willingly, but if OR were asked not to do the usual ‘install’ method and use this ‘Heath Robinson’ lash up, then reluctantly they may have done it..that though means if you complained about it , who is responsible OR or the developer ?
