cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
297 Views
Message 11 of 14

Re: Overhead vs. Underground FTTP

Thank you, makes sense.  I called BT to cancel it for now - they informed me that I'd need to switch by the end of the year as the copper network is being retired.  I thought this was just for phone lines, not FTTC broadband.

0 Ratings
Reply
285 Views
Message 12 of 14

Re: Overhead vs. Underground FTTP

Yes, even BT support seems to be confused about that.  For 99% of people, it will be just the PSTN phone system closing down, not FTTC.

However, in a very few places they are already starting to close the old exchanges and so FTTC may become unavailable.  That’s unlikely, though.

You could try looking here:

https://www.telecom-tariffs.co.uk/codelook.htm

Enter your exchange name under “Locality”.  When it comes up there should be a small link for the exchange name.  Click on that and in the info it gives it will say if there is a known closure date.

Alternatively, you could see if your exchange is in this list:

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2025/09/openreach-to-start-exiting-next-12-uk-exchanges-in-q3-...

 

261 Views
Message 13 of 14

Re: Overhead vs. Underground FTTP

Thanks for that.  The code look-up for my exchange (KIngsmead) says:

 

Exchange Exit:Not PlannedExchange Future:Fibre Handover Point Only

 

PSTN/ISDN Withdrawn:31st January 2027

 

0 Ratings
Reply
227 Views
Message 14 of 14

Re: Overhead vs. Underground FTTP

Yes, an interesting one.

FTTP travels a lot further than FTTC, so whereas Openreach currently have 5,600 exchanges, they only need 1000 going forward and the other 4,600 are set to close, sometime between now and 2040.

Basically, Fibre Handover Point means that exchange is one of the 1000.  What the implications of the “only” are for the continued availability of FTTC I’ve no idea.  It may mean they are stopping it from January, along with the PSTN, but I’d be surprised if they are stopping it that quickly.

Any thoughts @iniltous ?

0 Ratings
Reply