One one my BT accounts I have broadband on one telephone line (over copper wires, Halo 1) and on another telephone line no broadband at all and just the long standing telephone line. The total is about £100 a month. Both telephone line numbers including the one that only has broadband on it show on my bill.
When London is moved to Digital voice this year is the following what is likely to happen for that account:-
1. Landline only telephone number - BT will send some kind of basic hub product for me to make calls.
2. Broadband account telephone line - BT will do nothing so we keep the old hub (not a hub 2) as that line counts as a line with only broadband.
The above sounds logical to me.
It is an interesting situation because I suspect a lot of very inert long standing BT customers like I am probably do have a separate broadband line from the days when you could not use your dial up internet whilst also talking on the telephone which is why they will have my set up above.
if there are lots like I am then a more logical thing for BT would be to move the broadband service to over the landline number, ditch the other telephone number not used that provides the broadband service and send the customer a hub 2. However I suspect that will not be how their computer systems analyse accounts with one landline with no BB on it and another line just with BB.
I will just wait to see what happens as my sons will "kill" me if I do anything to affect this upstairs broadband they need for work, gaming and all sorts.
You have to be pro-active, BT can't second guess your requirements.
If you do nothing, things will just continue as they are. Line 1 (voice only) will be supplied with a low bandwidth device and remain voice only. Line 2 will remain broadband and voice.
You need to decide what you want going forward.
Thanks. Line 2 is a separate telephone line but does not have voice on it so we will end up with for this account the old hub with broadband on it on one line and the new low bandwidth device for the line with only voice on it
There is nothing wrong with the above particularly as it is no more expensive to have those 2 lines and rather than just the one line with the BB and voice on the same line but it just seems a bit complex and expensive for BT to have legacy customers with a telephone and a separate BB line from the dial up days out there getting tehse voice only new devices when they don't really need one.
(I have a separate account too with a different number but kept that off the post for simplicity).
@Jane2018 You said “particularly as it is no more expensive to have those 2 lines and rather than just the one line with the BB and voice on the same line”. But it is more expensive as you’re effectively paying line rental on both lines.
As you said you have Halo 1 are you are out of contract? Also I suspect that the broadband line may also have a phone on it. If you connect a phone to the broadband master socket do you get a dial tone?
Also you will be paying line rental on your 3rd line.
You are right.
On one of my accounts with two telephone numbers one of which has landline and the other has broadband I just checked the bill and that has £26.35 and last month 1.50 of call charges on it. So I think you are right that for that account with 2 numbers on it that costs an extra £26.35.
I probably could call BT and ask them to remove it.
I think the upstairs broadband line does not have a working telephone number on it as I checked in the past and I do not use that number anyway - we never have.
Both accounts are on Halo 1 without a hub2 but an older hub in each case. I am pretty sure we are out of contract. I have been with BT in this house since the 1990s and rarely changed anything other than putting in a fax line and a separate BB line back in the day and later ceasing the fax line, the burglar alarm line and another of our 6 lines about 5 years ago.
I suppose I could call BT (gosh I wish they would accept emails instead which take 2 seconds instead of ages of time, or wish I could do it by 2 clicks on line).... and ask them to cease the landline number we don't use and doesn't have BB on it. I wonder what the odds are the cost will remain exactly the same rather than I save the £26.35 a month line rental charge? I suppose that is my worry - everything is on the phone, no written record of requirements or orders made and massive scope for error such as BT turning off the upstairs broadband on that account rather than just the landline number. So inertia and perhaps thinking sometimes having 2 separate landline numbers might be useful has kept me paying that £26 a month.
@Jane2018 Just to recap and be sure what you have:
What exactly do you want to end up with? If you only want 1 telephone + broadband then the best option will be to have them on the same line. Do you still want a 2nd telephone line?
I have absolutely no idea why you think it costs an extra £25/m to have a landline number. The maximum it will cost is £5/m.
Can't be bothered to read the rest of the wall of text.
@licquorice Because they have 3 separate lines. 1 is telephone only and the other 2 are broadband & telephone.
Edit: sorry just realised that the £25 pounds was for the son saving on his broadband not the cost of the telephone only line.