cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
417 Views
Message 51 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE


@Kimberlinwrote:

@WSH 

So, just putting it out there, why exactly is it then that the almost 30 devices consistently connected via WiFi, there’s never a problem with connection? Maybe it’s my environmental conditions or a superior router 🤷‍♂️


Snap! I have almost the same number of devices connected and I have never had a problem with my router which just happens to be a Smarthub2. I guess that must make it a superior router!

0 Ratings
Reply
416 Views
Message 52 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

I initially thought who the hell has 30 wifi devices 

Then I did a head count and realised I have 26....shame

PS 

The cable solution is just silly...how would that work in the garden?

0 Ratings
Reply
403 Views
Message 53 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

@gg30340 Ahhh, yeah, but you can’t alter your DNS server settings at router level nor do you have WiFI6 or have WPA3 level security, but, you aren’t bothered by any of that so yes, your router is in fact superior in your environment 👍

0 Ratings
Reply
401 Views
Message 54 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

@Kodikid 

Obviously wifi has its place where it is not practical to have a wired connection but where it is possible to have a wired connection the wired connection will outperform a wireless connection.

You can for the likes of a garden or outhouse have a hybrid connection such as wired to an ethernet box and then  a Wireless Access Point (WAP)  or in the case of the garden wired to an outside WAP. This would extend the distance that a good strong wifi connection can be made thanks to the Ethernet cable doing most of the work.  

0 Ratings
Reply
385 Views
Message 55 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

@Kimberlin 

Ever since dial up days I have had an Internet connection and I have never had the need to change my DNS server settings at a router level and I get sufficient speeds etc from my wifi. In my opinion it is really only worth using WPA3 if your router already offers it.

It is certainly not worth spending extra money just to get WPA3 and in particular if the devices that you are connecting to it, which at this time may be the majority do not support WPA3 but each to their own.

 

0 Ratings
Reply
381 Views
Message 56 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

For the benefit of @Kodikid, the between the lines with imjolly's post:

Allison Kirkby, has now “shelved” the original re-branding strategy “amid concerns that dropping the historic brand risked alienating older customers” 

is that whereas younger customers are daft enough to sit still for us bumping them over to EE, old customers have the time, savvy and experience to shop around when we try it on, in which case we'll lose them to another ISP. 

361 Views
Message 57 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

Oh dear you're not actually supposed to label senior/ mature people as "old"

0 Ratings
Reply
336 Views
Message 58 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

Yes, the WiFi devices can certainly add up. Me and 'er indoors both have iPads, iPhones, we've two desktop PC's, 2 laptops, washing machine, dishwasher, security cameras, wireless thermostats, media speakers, the list goes on.
0 Ratings
Reply
334 Views
Message 59 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

@Kodikid 

If you're in that category as I am and so are quite a few others here then I think it's quite OK to use the terms "old" , "decrepit" etc

319 Views
Message 60 of 95

Re: BT 500 vs 900 vs EE

Are you talking about the smart hub 2?

0 Ratings
Reply