The DSL checker images only confirm what you had already stated , KCI2 ( two stage install ) and partial direct in ground , so essentially this is a dispute , OR state the installation for your address is outside the normal allowed budget , and you are required to contribute towards these costs or the order will be cancelled, and you dispute this ,
OR know where their network is in relation to your property so you are presumably saying they have made a mistake and their network is much closer than they think , and therefore any costs incurred will not exceed budget .
TBH , your last image is irrelevant ….
As stated , the nearest jointbox isn’t necessarily anything to do with the FTTP network, you need to know ( and that’s not going to be easy to find out ) where their network CBT for your address is located, if any network construction is required, duct , new jointboxes , etc , that can be very expensive depending on what’s needed , £4K is easily spent , and even with the allowed budget subtracted , that may require you to contribute.
However , these rules apply to USO ( universal service obligation ) if you have access to any network service , including mobile , that can provide 10Mb or more download , then it’s not a USO issue and if the costs were ( for example ) ‘only’ £600 and OR say they will pay £200 towards the £600 then it’s up to you to accept or decline…
FYI , this is the model that most Alt Nets use , and it has to be said , Openreach isn’t a charity, so adopting the same charging model as Alt Nets isn’t underhand or immoral, if they spend thousands ££ connecting you , in two years you could have access to an Alt Nets, and all OR would have got for their thousands in connecting you , is two years of wholesale rental ( £20 a month , if you pay an ISP £40 , OR only get £20 ) ...so OR get back £480 after spending potentially 7 -8 times that , that’s simply a commercial decision taken by a company required to make a profit, as said they are not a charity
