Hi
Really need some help understanding what's possible with a copper line at a property.
A relative has moved into a propery which is served by BT. There is also an approx 10Mpbs internet connection.
The phone line was in the name of the previous tennant which were in the process of taking over.
However, another party supports my relative at their property and were repeatedly being told that the internet is connected with them - something seperate from the previous tennant which is really confusing me.
All I see on the wall is a BT socket with 2 connections - one for data and the other voice?
Is it possible for 2 accounts to be on the same copper line?
i.e bill seperate for the voice and data?
Or could a 2nd line be present providing the internet ?
The voice at the propery has stopped working apparently due to a restriction on the service. The internet still does work but I'm concerned if its all one account then it could stop soon as well.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Yes, it was once possible to have the phone & broadband supplied by different companies, but this is no longer offered. So when you take over the line as a new customer, you'll have to choose one supplier for both.
If the previous occupant was with BT , and your relative is not using BT but has chosen to use another provider, their issue ( TBF ) has nothing to do with BT , and they ( or you ) should be taking it up with the provider you/they have chosen to use if they have no working service at the address …….phone sockets with ‘BT’ on them are simply from an era when BT were the network provider, that’s now Openreach .
As far as your questions ,
1 . Yes , but very rare ( shared metallic path facility ) but not offered anymore so cannot be your issue .
2. Yes , there may be another socket somewhere if the property had two lines previously.
If you can only ‘find’ the previous occupants ‘stopped’ BT service , then either another master socket exists with your providers service on it , or much more likely , your provider has not identified the correct address so has not taken over the correct BT service , or has not progressed your order at all .
Entirely possible.
The previous tenant should have cancelled both services but maybe they forgot they were split? But taking over the line with a new phone & broadband package will cancel the existing broadband.
Just bear in mind that a new phone package is likely to be digital through the broadband router rather than the existing telephone sockets. But I guess you won't know for sure until you order.
Sounds like no one has notified the companies of the death. The responsibility for that would usually fall to the next of kin but maybe there wasn't one. Hopefully that shouldn't prevent you taking over as new customer & as I said previously, that will terminate the broadband from the other supplier.
Would outstanding debt on the account prevent or hinder a takeover, given that it appears BT haven't been notified of the death of the existing account holder?
is you relative still in broadband contract and therefore transferring account to new home?
Outstanding debt isn’t a reason to cancel a takeover ( or a migration for that matter ) , so even if the former occupant left with an outstanding debt , all that happens is the ‘sorry to so you leave ‘ communication if the ‘line’ is still working ( working line takeover ) , if that goes unanswered 10 days later the change takes place .
Presumably the OP has had confirmation from the non BT provider they used that the service is ready , so the possible reasons why that provider hasn’t got their service onto the socket the OP has found have been mentioned.
TBH , the only way forward is for whatever company the OP relative has used to investigate why service hasn’t started , and if necessary task Openreach to visit .
Is anyone else getting this thread presented incorrectly, my entry ( this one ) shows as message 1 , the original post as message 10 , makes reading the entire thread weird , last post first , first post last .