What’s actually your complaint ? , there are hundreds of Communication Providers , many of them offer services over Openreach network, if you don’t like the BT price , there are a huge number of alternatives on Openreach ….the fact that you could be on a BT 40Mb profile but only get 5Mb but you pay the same as another BT customer on a 40Mb profile that can get 40Mb , ( that’s physics, they have a shorter line length than you ) …you are connected to identical equipment, so why would the price be different ? ,but as stated don’t like BT price, use someone else, but FYI , no one prices on a speed you get basis , why on earth would a company do that ? , the laws of physics are not negotiable.
If an Alternative Network were given government funding to provide a ‘Superfast’ network but didn’t , and the company that obtained that failed company’s assets also haven’t provided a network, the fact is that it cannot be a commercially viable , otherwise public money shouldn’t be used , and as the state assistance wasn’t given to Openreach but someone else , and as BT only use Openreach, it’s not likely that BT will be in a post offer you anything better ( in the short to medium term )
It’s seems odd that you blame BT ( who don’t have a network ) and by association Openreach , who were not given the state assistance to upgrade your area , if the company given a subsidy can’t provide a network, why would a company without a subsidy, consider that area ? , perhaps whoever allocated the funding should have had better due diligence, surely your displeasure is misplaced
