I'm looking for advise on how I can prevent someone maliciously reporting a fault on my landline and then having a divert setup to their mobile phone.
I ask because that's what happened to me last Wednesday (10th Jan). Someone reported my landline as faulty and got BT to setup call divert to their mobile phone. They then used this to attempt to gain access to my Halifax online service, but fortunately Halifax spotted the suspicious activity and prevented it.
Log of events:
Date | Time | Action | |
10/01/2024 | 16:34 | Reported Fault : Problem : Landline - Cant make or receive calls : Reference number : VOL053-************ | |
10/01/2024 | Other products affected | ||
Date | 16:42 | Text from BT about repair appointment on 19th January | |
10/01/2024 | 16:45 | Text from Openreach about repair appointment on 19th January | |
10/01/2024 | 16:50 | You've set up call divert : You've diverted your incoming calls to : 07******** | |
10/01/2024 | 18:45 | Text from Openreach about repair appointment | |
10/01/2024 | 19:08 | 00:00:32 | Outgoing call to 07******* |
10/01/2024 | 19:09 | 00:00:49 | Outgoing call to 07******* |
10/01/2024 | 19:09 | Alert Text from Halifax | |
10/01/2024 | 19:10 | Alert Text from Halifax | |
10/01/2024 | Appointment Cancelled | ||
10/01/2024 | Fault fixed | ||
10/01/2024 | 19:40 | Call divert changed : You've stopped diverting your incoming calls to : 07******** |
So, my main question is how can I prevent this happening again?
But other questions remain:
I have to say that I was shocked at how easy it is for someone to take-over my landline.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @tarbat Thanks for posting and welcome to the community, I'm sorry this has happened and I'm glad your bank noticed the suspicious activity. I've removed the fault reference number and mobile from your post as it's not advisable to publically post this on the community, especially in light of what has recently happened.
When a divert is set up as part of a fault report high validation checks should be completed by the advisor who is handling the call. This is done via security validation questions or by sending a PIN to a contact number or email address that's already on your account. We can also password-protect an account, I would recommend that this is set up to add another layer of security to your BT account if it has not already been done.
Call divert is free when a fault is reported but you may still have to pay for the diverted part of the call, is that related to the question about the outgoing calls as it's not possible to make a call from someone else's landline?
I would like to take a closer look at this for you and will send you a private message in a moment so you can contact the community moderation team with your details.
Thanks
Neil
Thanks for the quick response. I'll await the message.
Yes, this hacker was able to make TWO outgoing calls from my landline, or at least that's what appears on my usage page. These were definitely NOT made from my house, as we were in at the time and made no such calls. My Call Recording device confirms this.
The 2 outgoing caalls you mention are to mobiles so i suspect they were calls being received then diverted to that mobile
@garybs29wrote:The 2 outgoing caalls you mention are to mobiles so i suspect they were calls being received then diverted to that mobile
Thankyou, that makes sense. I'd been worrying about how someone could make outgoing calls. Presumably the Caller-ID would have appeared as my landline number at the receiving phone? How can I find out who these two calls were from, just in case the callers have inadvertently talked to the hacker?
Hello,
I'm just curious. In order to gain access to a bank account, you will need a lot more information than just the 'one time code' sent over mobile or landline, such as account number, sort code, name, that kind of thing.
So we can only assume that the 'hacker' had the account holder name, account number, sort code and home phone number? This doesn't sound like a random chancer. It sounds more like someone who has access to these details already, but just doesn't have access to the house to grab that phone call.
One would also assume that BT would run checks on the line supposedly faulty and found it not faulty before randomly diverting calls to random people's mobile numbers? If BT were to actually find the line faulty when it shouldn't have been, then someone needs access to the property to 'make it faulty' by loosening some wires.
It may be a bit Columbo, or Miss Marple, but… this sounds suspiciously like someone very familiar with the household who is desperately trying to get around the bank security some way to nab some cash that isn't theirs.
Pure speculation.
But… none of this sounds like the usual 'hoax' call trying to get information out of an unsuspecting householder. It sounds a lot more personal and targeted.
Thinking aloud, when this hacker reported a fault and diverted all my calls, why wouldn't BT have:
I wonder what the Openreach engineer is going to make of this when he arrives on Friday to fix the reported fault?
@wkirkmanwrote:Hello,
I'm just curious. In order to gain access to a bank account, you will need a lot more information than just the 'one time code' sent over mobile or landline, such as account number, sort code, name, that kind of thing.
They didn't gain access. They attempted to register a new device on the bank's app, so that they could reset authentication data (name, password, memorable info, etc), and the bank stopped that because when they made a callback to my registered landline phone number, it looked suspicious. The bank has confirmed that all the person knew was my USER-ID, which is easy to guess from my email address. So presumably I'm on a hacked list with my name and email address listed.
No actual fraud happened, but I had to go through lengthy phone calls with Halifax to get this sorted out, including new bank cards, etc.
None of that excuses BT allowing someone to set up an unauthorised call divert on my landline.
@wkirkmanwrote:One would also assume that BT would run checks on the line supposedly faulty and found it not faulty before randomly diverting calls to random people's mobile numbers? If BT were to actually find the line faulty when it shouldn't have been, then someone needs access to the property to 'make it faulty' by loosening some wires.
There was no fault on the line. I'm still puzzled as to why BT didn't verify this first. How would the hacker gain access to the wires, other than at the exchange. Our line is underground all the way to the back of our house, and I'd have seen someone tampering with wires there!
Not sure if MODS have seen my reply to their message, but the phone number you tried contacting me on is the HACKER’S phone number, not the contact number I provided. I do hope you haven’t actually spoken to the hacker instead of me 😞