That’s a strange argument to make , not having FTTP devalues , but there is no added value with having FTTP , that’s pretty much the same as having FTTP adds value , it is a distinction without a difference , the lack of FTTP wont have devalued a property , but it may be worth less than the same property with FTTP , but its not really devalued, it simply hasn’t increased in value by the amount that those with FTTP have.
Its a different argument to feel disadvantaged that someone else with a broadly similar property with FTTP that was provided without them having to contribute towards the install ,has seen an increase but for you to see a similar increase would have to pay more than them towards getting it , you both gain , it’s just your hypothetical gain is not quite as cost free as theirs ( obviously this is an invented property just for comparison sake ) , but if your property is located in such a position that ECC’s are necessary, and this other ‘similar property’ didn’t have need ECC’s because it’s location wasn’t quite as remote , arguably your more relatively remote location with FTTP no doubt would increase its value more than a more urban one , as it then has the best of everything, all the benefits of the location but without the penalty of slow internet
