I'm also on v=ci-MX_3.2.1#
It didn't seem to have the problems you report (Windows 7, Chrome), but I did notice a number of remaining buglets.
That'll do for now.
Oh for goodness sake it isn't the mail service that is the problem, it's the webmail interface. As I keep posting but nobody seems to want to stop banging their heads against a brick wall. Simply use a mail client (app) such as Thunderbird, it will be a revelation to you.
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-GB/
The best description I can give is it the proper tool for the job
User interfaces matter - as I learned, slowly and painfully, when I was asked to design one shortly after the release of Windows 3.0 (over 30 years ago).
BT is in danger of abusing its near-monopoly position (when considered in conjunction with its partner Openreach). I chose to switch to a BT mail account when extended-reach broadband finally reached my village, at the then-magnificent speed of 512 Kbit/sec. Since then, I have upgraded to 70Mbit FTTC - FTTP is not yet available - and BT have unilaterally switched me to VOIP over that link. My landline, email address, and broadband service form a holistic combined communications package, and I like to keep it that way. (It's a single point of contact for breakdowns - reduces buck-passing)
I can use the current offering, and I choose to continue with it - while still being acutely aware of the shortcomings of the new interface, and being ready to work with you to improve it. Call it beta testing.
I hate the new email appearance and the way it behaves. I cannot adjust the screen layout and have it stay the way I want: it just reverts each time. Also it is very very sluggish to open email after it is selected/highlighted. I cannot get the drop down menus to stay open when trying to move an email to one of my folders.
Is there any way to revert to the old version?
No. But see messages 356 and 358
Since the new email I found that my old signature is no longer acceptable. Apparently the links I had had in it for ages are now making it too large, as is italicising one line of the text. These actions apparently take it over the 1kb limit.
Come on BT this is absurd. Sort it out.
No. But see messages 356 and 358
Because I chose to display the messages here in "newest first" order, I think the messages you mean are currently numbered 5 and 2. They'll move down by one when I post this reply.
"no fixed, searchable, numbering" is a weakness of this message board, not the BT webmail user interface.